Picture of a silhouette of a head with a colourful atoms design inside

Qualitative Lead(s)

Professor Vanessa Lawrence

Project Lead & Team

Programme Chief Investigator: Robert Howard
Multidisciplinary programme involving neurologists, psychiatrists, ophthalmologists, psychologists, epidemiologists, and patient and public involvement representatives.

Project Dates

2013–2018

Funding Source(s)

NIHR Programme Grants for Applied Research

Qualitative Design used

Field of Research

Dementia; Parkinson’s disease; neurodegenerative disorders; visual hallucinations; clinical management and service design, evidence-informed Guideline Development

Geographic/Contextual Setting

UK neurology clinics, ophthalmology services, memory clinics, and community mental health services.

Study of Visual Hallucinations in Parkinson’s Disease, Eye Disease and Dementia

SHAPED was a multi-centre NIHR Programme Grant investigating the prevalence, impact, mechanisms, and clinical management of visual hallucinations across neurological and ophthalmological conditions, including dementia, Parkinson’s disease, and eye disease. Qualitative research formed a key component of the programme, exploring the lived experiences, needs, and management preferences of individuals experiencing visual hallucinations and their caregivers. Findings informed the development of clinical management recommendations and contributed to consensus guideline development for visual hallucinations across diagnostic groups.

Qualitative Approach and Methods

Aim of the qualitative component

To understand the lived experience, impacts, coping strategies, and support needs of individuals experiencing visual hallucinations and their caregivers, and to generate evidence informing clinical management strategies and guideline development.

Qualitative methodology

A multi-phase qualitative research programme combining experience-based qualitative studies, stakeholder needs assessment, and integration of qualitative findings into programme-level evidence synthesis and clinical recommendation development.

Which qualitative methods were used?

  • Individual qualitative interviews with people experiencing visual hallucinations and their caregivers across diagnostic groups.
  • Stakeholder consultation workshops informing management recommendations.
  • Integration of qualitative findings with epidemiological and clinical programme components to inform guidance.

Sampling & recruitment

Participants were purposively recruited from neurology, ophthalmology, and memory services to capture variation in diagnosis, hallucination characteristics, disease stage, and caregiving context. Informal caregivers were recruited alongside participants where possible.

Data analysis: how the team made sense of the data

Interview data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis, with cross-condition comparisons identifying shared and condition-specific mechanisms influencing distress, disclosure, coping, and clinical support needs.

Findings, Learning & Impact

Summary of main findings

Qualitative findings demonstrated that stigma, fear of clinical consequences, and uncertainty about symptom meaning often delayed disclosure of hallucinations to clinicians. Patient distress was strongly influenced by insight, caregiver responses, and disease progression, highlighting the need for tailored clinical communication and caregiver support strategies across disease stages.

Why were qualitative methods used in this project, and what did they enable?

Qualitative research enabled the programme to:

  • Capture patient and caregiver perspectives not represented in epidemiological datasets.
  • Identify barriers to symptom disclosure and care access.
  • Inform clinically relevant management recommendations grounded in lived experience.
  • Support development of transdiagnostic clinical guidance.

Lessons learnt / reflections?

  • Hallucinations are frequently under-reported due to stigma and fear of institutionalisation or medication changes.
  • Caregiver and clinician responses strongly shape patient coping and distress.
  • Embedding qualitative research within programme grants strengthens the clinical relevance and implementation potential of findings.

Impact & influence

SHAPED generated one of the first transdiagnostic evidence bases for understanding visual hallucinations across neurological and ophthalmological conditions. Qualitative findings informed consensus clinical guidance and contributed to improved awareness of patient and caregiver needs, shaping subsequent clinical research, management frameworks, and service discussions relating to hallucinations in dementia and Parkinson’s disease.

Links, Outputs & Resources

Links to publications

  • Renouf, S., Ffytche, D., Pinto, R., Murray, J., & Lawrence, V. (2018). Visual hallucinations in dementia and Parkinson’s disease: A qualitative exploration of patient and caregiver experiences. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 33(10), 1327–1334. Available here.
  • O’Brien, J., Taylor, J. P., Ballard, C., Barker, R. A., Bradley, C., Burns, A., Collerton, D., Dave, S., Dudley, R., Francis, P., Gibbons, A., Harris, K., Lawrence, V., Leroi, I., McKeith, I., Michaelides, M., Naik, C., O’Callaghan, C., Olsen, K., … Ffytche, D. (2020). Visual hallucinations in neurological and ophthalmological disease: Pathophysiology and management. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 91(5), 512–519. Available here.