Series 6: Controversies in Qualitative Research

In an academic landscape dominated by formality and jargon, Johnny Saldaña brings a refreshingly raw perspective with his ideas on ‘Blue Collar Qualitative Research’. We speak to him about how to challenge the ivory towers of academia. We also explore his ‘kick-ass’ article that tackles positionality, voice, ethics, and many other foundational aspects of qualitative research. Saldaña’s unfiltered perspective invites listeners to reflect on the power dynamics that shape our academic voice.

The involvement of service users in research holds transformative potential, but what happens when it becomes mere tokenism? When is it better to step away? With insights from the National Survivor User Network, we discuss the critical line between genuine engagement and superficial involvement, seeking ways to ensure research remains grounded, relevant, and truly collaborative.

Amidst the ongoing occupation and genocide in Palestine, how do qualitative health researchers navigate their work and find their voice? What kind of research is it possible or ethical to do under siege? This episode delves into the courage, resilience, and ethical considerations that researchers from this region grapple with, touching upon the broader implications for academic freedom and advocacy.

In October 2023, then-minister Michelle Donelan accused members of UK Research and Innovation’s EDI committee of holding “extremist views” based on their social media comments on Palestine. She was subsequently forced to retract her statement, but the response from UKRI raised broader questions about whether and how government should be able to influence research. Peter and Sohail get into the details of this debate, covering culture wars, litigious article authors, and more.

In this episode we challenge the misconception that qualitative research is too slow and narrow to influence emergency response planning. Despite the common preference for quantitative data in crises, we spotlight the irreplaceable insights that qualitative research provides—insights into human behaviour, cultural context, and community dynamics that are crucial during emergencies. Join us as we explore real-world examples where nuanced, qualitative data has informed swift, culturally sensitive, and effective emergency responses, proving that in the heat of the moment, every narrative counts.

Sohail speaks to 3rd year PhD student Tiarna Lee to explore the frontier of AI’s role in health research. From ethical considerations to methodological accuracy, join us as we dissect the potential and pitfalls of integrating AI in research. We ask, “can you have qualitative health research without the heart and soul?”

In July 2023, all 44 editors of the acclaimed Critical Public Health journal simultaneously resigned, citing concerns about Taylor and Francis’ pricing system. They went to found a new independent journal, the Journal of Critical Public Health. We speak to one of the editors who resigned, who sheds light on the intricate dynamics between profit, pricing, and the neoliberal influence on qualitative health research.